Re: LSD abuse plummets dramatically, PCP has a resurgence in popularity.

[rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski]

"rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski" <rfgdxm@vivisectSPAMMERSmochamail.com>
wrote in message
news:3f4c08dc$0$157$892e7fe2@authen.puce.readfreen ews.net...
> Notable part:
>
> "Over the same two year-period, emergency department mentions of LSD
> dropped 78 percent, but mentions of PCP rose 42 percent."
>
> LSD abuse has is less than a quarter of what it was 2 years ago.
Most
> definitely a major victory in the War on Drugs. However, there is
still
> interest in psychedelics out there. PCP user is up sharply in the same
> time period.

For anyone who wants to see the actual numbers:

http://dawninfo.samhsa.gov/pubs_94_02/pickatable/2002/2.2.0.xls

Yeah, SAMHSA made that available in an Excel spreadsheet, and if you
can't handle that you are shit out of luck. :(


1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

LSD 5,682 4,569 5,219 4,982 5,126 4,016 2,821 891
PCP 5,963 3,441 3,626 3,436 3,663 5,404 6,102 7,648

change change change
since 95 since 2000 since 2001

LSD -84.3 -77.8 -68.4
PCP 28.3 41.5 25.3
-------

Look at that huge drop in the LSD number since 1995. This implies LSD
abuse today is just about 1/6th of what is was in 1995. Usage of PCP
however appears to be at the highest point since the mid 1990s.
--
http://www.dextromethorphan.ws/
For information about the psychedelic drug DXM, including dangers.

[Buggin69]

rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote:
>
> Look at that huge drop in the LSD number since 1995. This implies
> LSD abuse today is just about 1/6th of what is was in 1995. Usage of
> PCP however appears to be at the highest point since the mid 1990s.

availability

[Buggin69]

rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote:
> "Buggin69" <buggin69@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:ciU2b.99259$Ij4.96646@news2.central.cox.net.. .
>> rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote:
>>>
>>> Look at that huge drop in the LSD number since 1995. This implies
>>> LSD abuse today is just about 1/6th of what is was in 1995. Usage of
>>> PCP however appears to be at the highest point since the mid 1990s.
>>
>> availability
>
> I suspect this is a major factor. This is why I called this a
> "major victory in the War on Drugs." The DEA was able to successfully
> get enough LSD producers behind bars, and likely this scared of
> others from making the same mistake, that LSD production is way down.

well damn, how many did they have to get... 3, 4, 7...?
it's not like it was that hard for them

[rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski]

Buggin69 wrote:
> rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote:

>> I suspect this is a major factor. This is why I called this a
>> "major victory in the War on Drugs." The DEA was able to successfully
>> get enough LSD producers behind bars, and likely this scared of
>> others from making the same mistake, that LSD production is way down.
>
> well damn, how many did they have to get... 3, 4, 7...?
> it's not like it was that hard for them

This likely was a major factor. Just find the narcotics producers
making LSD and lock them up for good. It isn't like it is easy for
others to take their place. Unlike marijuana, where learning how to grow
it isn't that hard.
--
http://www.dextromethorphan.ws/
For information about the psychedelic drug DXM, including dangers.

[Buggin69]

rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote:
> Buggin69 wrote:
>> rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote:
>
>>> I suspect this is a major factor. This is why I called this a
>>> "major victory in the War on Drugs." The DEA was able to
>>> successfully get enough LSD producers behind bars, and likely this
>>> scared of others from making the same mistake, that LSD production
>>> is way down.
>>
>> well damn, how many did they have to get... 3, 4, 7...?
>> it's not like it was that hard for them
>
> This likely was a major factor. Just find the narcotics producers
> making LSD and lock them up for good. It isn't like it is easy for
> others to take their place. Unlike marijuana, where learning how to
> grow it isn't that hard.


Learning how to grow MJ. LAUGH. Here, I'll teach you all right now. Put
the seed in the groud a couple inches and water when needed. There you
go. Pot will grow. Any other specifics are up to you but if you just
want some pretty plants in your yard this will work just fine. Some may
not sprout. This is ok. Not all seeds are viable. Try again.

[rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski]

Buggin69 wrote:
> rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski wrote:
>> Buggin69 wrote:

>> This likely was a major factor. Just find the narcotics producers
>> making LSD and lock them up for good. It isn't like it is easy for
>> others to take their place. Unlike marijuana, where learning how to
>> grow it isn't that hard.
>
> Learning how to grow MJ. LAUGH. Here, I'll teach you all right now.
> Put the seed in the groud a couple inches and water when needed.
> There you go. Pot will grow. Any other specifics are up to you but if
> you just want some pretty plants in your yard this will work just
> fine. Some may not sprout. This is ok. Not all seeds are viable. Try
> again.

You might want to consider learning indoor cultivation, as pot plants
in your yard may stand out to the police. ;)
--
http://www.dextromethorphan.ws/
For information about the psychedelic drug DXM, including dangers.

[rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski]

The Hon. John Frink wrote:
>>> This likely was a major factor. Just find the narcotics producers
>>> making LSD and lock them up for good. It isn't like it is easy for
>>> others to take their place. Unlike marijuana, where learning how to
>>> grow it isn't that hard.
>
> Oh good. Im glad the lack of LSD isnt because Im getting older and
> only teenagers seemed to have access to it like I used to (in 1995/96
> when I did the majority of LSD). Oh well.

On the demand side for LSD I'd expect a large percentage of the
potential market is older people.
--
http://www.dextromethorphan.ws/
For information about the psychedelic drug DXM, including dangers.

[Reach The Sky]

"rfgdxm/Robert F. Golaszewski" <rfgdxm@vivisectSPAMMERSmochamail.com> a
écrit dans le message de
news:3f50bbfe$0$162$892e7fe2@authen.puce.readfreen ews.net...
> The Hon. John Frink wrote:
> >>> This likely was a major factor. Just find the narcotics producers
> >>> making LSD and lock them up for good. It isn't like it is easy for
> >>> others to take their place. Unlike marijuana, where learning how to
> >>> grow it isn't that hard.
> >
> > Oh good. Im glad the lack of LSD isnt because Im getting older and
> > only teenagers seemed to have access to it like I used to (in 1995/96
> > when I did the majority of LSD). Oh well.
>
> On the demand side for LSD I'd expect a large percentage of the
> potential market is older people.
> --

roflmao!


> http://www.dextromethorphan.ws/
> For information about the psychedelic drug DXM, including dangers.
>
>

[Shaun Rimmer]

"Buggin69" <buggin69@cox.net> wrote in message
news:LR23b.99757$Ij4.8275@news2.central.cox.net...

> Learning how to grow MJ. LAUGH. Here, I'll teach you all right now. Put
> the seed in the groud a couple inches and water when needed. There you
> go. Pot will grow. Any other specifics are up to you but if you just
> want some pretty plants in your yard this will work just fine. Some may
> not sprout. This is ok. Not all seeds are viable. Try again.

Yeah, someone I knew here (North England FFS) had a 6' + plant, grown
completely outdoors. Child's play.


Shaun aRe - Tense may be have been altered and specifics omitted to protect
the paranoi......I mean innocent.